![]() ![]() For example, one of the two primary objectives on reviewing corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature is to make what we know about such literature more accessible to wider audiences or scholars. I have learned from writing research articles that it is not the bulky nature of the articles that send vital and quality message to the readers or review boards, it is how the every bit and piece of the writing follow standard guidelines in qualitative research. The impression of how effective research can be done is apparently aimed at giving other people some good ideas on how they might undertake their own research. Validity and reliability are important terms of consideration as well. Rather than opting for the criteria promoted by one variety, “paradigm,” “moment,” or “school,” within qualitative research, practicing researchers can learn valuable lessons from each other (Seale, 1999). ![]() That is also to say that the variability of outsets of qualitative research exist to shape the trustworthiness and credibility, with challenging prerogatives as to what amount a good quality work (Seale, 1999). When it comes to detailed notion of what constitutes quality in qualitative research, there comes variety of explanations that deal with such conception. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |